PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.41%
Revenue growth under 50% of ON's 33.37%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-0.40%
Negative gross profit growth while ON is at 30.70%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
3.22%
EBIT growth below 50% of ON's 8.44%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
3.22%
Operating income growth under 50% of ON's 8.44%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-11.18%
Negative net income growth while ON stands at 64.42%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-10.00%
Negative EPS growth while ON is at 32.74%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-10.20%
Negative diluted EPS growth while ON is at 19.05%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.53%
Share reduction while ON is at 29.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.52%
Reduced diluted shares while ON is at 31.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.23%
Dividend reduction while ON stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-19.03%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-41.00%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
83.22%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
87.61%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
27.99%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x ON's 19.44%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
99.01%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
79.80%
Below 50% of ON's 258.66%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-22.36%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
1239.80%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 788.82% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
536.36%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 126.47%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
15.83%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of ON's 18.82%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
98.52%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 46.23%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
19.49%
Below 50% of ON's 161.32%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
7.75%
Below 50% of ON's 231.03%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
373.94%
Dividend/share CAGR of 373.94% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
367.18%
Dividend/share CAGR of 367.18% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
298.29%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while ON cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
8.51%
AR growth well above ON's 5.21%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
4.63%
We show growth while ON is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
0.36%
Positive asset growth while ON is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.83%
Positive BV/share change while ON is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.06%
Our R&D shrinks while ON invests at 67.49%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-1.61%
We cut SG&A while ON invests at 40.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.