PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.07%
Revenue growth under 50% of ON's 3.34%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-6.06%
Negative gross profit growth while ON is at 15.66%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-10.44%
Negative EBIT growth while ON is at 120.36%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-10.44%
Negative operating income growth while ON is at 120.36%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-4.25%
Negative net income growth while ON stands at 78.95%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-4.44%
Negative EPS growth while ON is at 66.67%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-2.27%
Negative diluted EPS growth while ON is at 87.50%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-1.21%
Share reduction while ON is at 0.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.72%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.46%
Dividend growth of 0.46% while ON is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
102.70%
OCF growth under 50% of ON's 219.33%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
243.37%
FCF growth under 50% of ON's 719.84%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
91.91%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
76.29%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
17.50%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to ON's 19.05%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
123.71%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
171.96%
Below 50% of ON's 4917.36%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-13.46%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ON stands at 76.39%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
311.00%
Positive 10Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
66.06%
Below 50% of ON's 268.95%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
11.12%
Below 50% of ON's 67.20%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
100.48%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 48.28%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
16.45%
Below 50% of ON's 180.83%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
5.88%
Below 50% of ON's 244.49%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
361.29%
Dividend/share CAGR of 361.29% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
366.79%
Dividend/share CAGR of 366.79% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
652488.96%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 652488.96% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-2.04%
Firm’s AR is declining while ON shows 8.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-4.60%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
0.68%
Asset growth well under 50% of ON's 2.50%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.34%
50-75% of ON's 4.41%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.89%
We increase R&D while ON cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-8.88%
We cut SG&A while ON invests at 2.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.