PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-16.26%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-26.53%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
22.34%
EBIT growth below 50% of ON's 99.09%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
-80.00%
Negative operating income growth while ON is at 99.09%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-84.11%
Negative net income growth while ON stands at 93.31%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-88.89%
Negative EPS growth while ON is at 93.44%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-88.89%
Negative diluted EPS growth while ON is at 93.44%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.47%
Share reduction while ON is at 2.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.62%
Reduced diluted shares while ON is at 2.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.47%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while ON cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-77.55%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-80.02%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
28.28%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-3.43%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-22.22%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
45.03%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-13.19%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-43.98%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-91.64%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-93.70%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while ON is 60.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-96.39%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
72.90%
Below 50% of ON's 9572.03%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
3.59%
Below 50% of ON's 199.58%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
1.88%
Below 50% of ON's 350.92%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
435.74%
Dividend/share CAGR of 435.74% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
417.97%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while ON is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
265.17%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 265.17% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
23.22%
AR growth well above ON's 2.01%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-20.15%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-3.38%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-0.78%
We have a declining book value while ON shows 19.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.44%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-15.75%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.