PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.34%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of ON's 5.12%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
7.29%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of ON's 10.69%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
14.75%
EBIT growth below 50% of ON's 68.61%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
14.68%
Operating income growth under 50% of ON's 68.61%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
21.75%
Net income growth under 50% of ON's 127.42%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
23.26%
EPS growth under 50% of ON's 114.29%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
23.81%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of ON's 114.29%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-1.04%
Share reduction while ON is at 0.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.63%
Reduced diluted shares while ON is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
9.10%
Dividend growth of 9.10% while ON is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
20.02%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x ON's 16.78%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
-7.07%
Negative FCF growth while ON is at 19.84%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
54.53%
10Y CAGR of 54.53% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
32.29%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
2.56%
Positive 3Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
42.74%
OCF/share CAGR of 42.74% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
6.47%
Below 50% of ON's 178.60%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
40.02%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
99.29%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 99.29% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
85.55%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of ON's 146.88%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
15.90%
Positive short-term CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
45.75%
Equity/share CAGR of 45.75% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
3.31%
Below 50% of ON's 209.48%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
1.15%
Below 50% of ON's 428.37%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
508.03%
Dividend/share CAGR of 508.03% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
370.06%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while ON is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
203.64%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while ON cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-11.01%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
7.71%
Inventory growth well above ON's 2.16%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
1.81%
Asset growth well under 50% of ON's 6.14%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
4.09%
Under 50% of ON's 8.19%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.80%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
2.35%
We expand SG&A while ON cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.