PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.66%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of ON's 10.68%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
6.29%
Gross profit growth under 50% of ON's 17.21%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
8.23%
EBIT growth above 1.5x ON's 0.48%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
8.57%
Operating income growth above 1.5x ON's 0.48%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
0.46%
Positive net income growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.72%
Share reduction while ON is at 0.59%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.11%
Reduced diluted shares while ON is at 0.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.73%
Dividend growth of 0.73% while ON is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-29.07%
Negative OCF growth while ON is at 7.04%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-13.10%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
53.66%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
48.77%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 8.38%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
17.46%
Positive 3Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
133.79%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 6.60%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
87.28%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to ON's 80.18%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
49.88%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 17.35%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
106.89%
Positive 10Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
120.86%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of ON's 153.56%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
49.13%
Positive short-term CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
15.89%
Below 50% of ON's 11853.10%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
13.63%
Below 50% of ON's 221.85%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
1.63%
Below 50% of ON's 559.17%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
463.52%
Dividend/share CAGR of 463.52% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
378.03%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while ON is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
200.44%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while ON cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
19.50%
AR growth well above ON's 14.56%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
6.16%
Inventory growth well above ON's 10.26%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
2.07%
Asset growth well under 50% of ON's 5.45%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.59%
Under 50% of ON's 7.64%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.52%
R&D dropping or stable vs. ON's 28.60%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
3.16%
SG&A declining or stable vs. ON's 25.19%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.