PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.08%
Revenue growth above 1.5x ON's 6.02%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
12.14%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x ON's 6.88%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
15.73%
EBIT growth 75-90% of ON's 20.55%. Bill Ackman would push for cost reforms or better product mix to narrow the gap.
16.53%
Operating income growth at 75-90% of ON's 20.55%. Bill Ackman would demand a plan to enhance operating leverage.
16.87%
Net income growth at 50-75% of ON's 24.92%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
18.87%
EPS growth similar to ON's 20.00%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
19.23%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of ON's 28.57%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
-2.03%
Share reduction while ON is at 0.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-2.01%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.70%
Dividend growth of 0.70% while ON is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-20.85%
Negative OCF growth while ON is at 45.11%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-43.18%
Negative FCF growth while ON is at 57.40%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
74.35%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
45.91%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 14.29%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
21.46%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 3.45%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
24.50%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-8.14%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while ON is at 52.06%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-25.55%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ON stands at 93.90%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-15.87%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while ON is at 1563.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
65.53%
Below 50% of ON's 152.40%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
49.96%
Positive short-term CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
9.16%
Below 50% of ON's 53.76%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
15.04%
Below 50% of ON's 237.78%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
0.96%
Below 50% of ON's 680.92%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
513.01%
Dividend/share CAGR of 513.01% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
384.68%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while ON is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
52.06%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 52.06% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
12.39%
AR growth well above ON's 6.12%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
5.72%
Inventory growth well above ON's 8.03%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-1.67%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
1.55%
Under 50% of ON's 9.70%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.95%
We increase R&D while ON cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
5.29%
SG&A growth well above ON's 7.00%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.