PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.98%
Revenue growth above 1.5x ON's 2.98%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
7.66%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x ON's 1.11%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
11.16%
EBIT growth above 1.5x ON's 6.11%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
10.84%
Operating income growth above 1.5x ON's 6.11%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
11.70%
Net income growth comparable to ON's 11.56%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
12.70%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x ON's 11.11%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
14.52%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x ON's 11.11%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
-1.99%
Share reduction while ON is at 0.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-2.05%
Reduced diluted shares while ON is at 0.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.75%
Dividend reduction while ON stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
134.52%
Positive OCF growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
230.47%
Positive FCF growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
72.02%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
42.89%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 13.66%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
22.19%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 0.39%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
292.55%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
19.41%
Below 50% of ON's 50.60%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
3.03%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
83.88%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 16.82% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
86.72%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of ON's 121.69%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
32.48%
Positive short-term CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
16.38%
Below 50% of ON's 61.81%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
15.09%
Below 50% of ON's 257.67%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
7.05%
Below 50% of ON's 1711.91%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
493.84%
Dividend/share CAGR of 493.84% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
784467.57%
Dividend/share CAGR of 784467.57% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
50.12%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while ON cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
2.27%
Our AR growth while ON is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
5.56%
Inventory growth well above ON's 9.11%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
3.99%
Asset growth at 50-75% of ON's 6.04%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
4.19%
50-75% of ON's 8.29%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.38%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. ON's 5.32%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
3.44%
We expand SG&A while ON cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.