PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.75%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-8.29%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-0.24%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
0.24%
Positive operating income growth while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
9.66%
Positive net income growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
11.27%
Positive EPS growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
8.45%
Positive diluted EPS growth while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-1.01%
Share reduction while ON is at 0.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.59%
Reduced diluted shares while ON is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
8.09%
Dividend growth of 8.09% while ON is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-6.68%
Negative OCF growth while ON is at 29.29%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
0.76%
FCF growth under 50% of ON's 58.95%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
72.41%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
34.31%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 21.74%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
16.04%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 1.20%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
177.75%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
85.39%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of ON's 148.50%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
1.19%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 13.66%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
120.11%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 37.22% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
96.83%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 0.06%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
46.06%
Positive short-term CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
22.64%
Below 50% of ON's 61.05%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
19.66%
Below 50% of ON's 426.80%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
22.49%
Below 50% of ON's 6022.71%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
511.63%
Dividend/share CAGR of 511.63% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
336.24%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while ON is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
29.79%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while ON cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-13.45%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
6.74%
Inventory growth well above ON's 2.85%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
5.95%
Asset growth at 50-75% of ON's 8.34%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
5.84%
Similar to ON's 5.97%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.00%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-0.26%
We cut SG&A while ON invests at 4.80%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.