PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.95%
Revenue growth under 50% of ON's 4.04%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
1.45%
Gross profit growth under 50% of ON's 9.78%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-0.33%
Negative EBIT growth while ON is at 74.01%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-0.33%
Negative operating income growth while ON is at 74.01%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
0.90%
Positive net income growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
1.79%
Positive EPS growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1.82%
Positive diluted EPS growth while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.94%
Share reduction while ON is at 1.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.17%
Reduced diluted shares while ON is at 1.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-1.03%
Dividend reduction while ON stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
22.29%
OCF growth above 1.5x ON's 8.28%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
10.25%
FCF growth under 50% of ON's 38.75%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
163.00%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 13.36%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
25.66%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 74.61%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
17.83%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 43.30%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
66.82%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 462.58%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
32.66%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 21.17%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
38.83%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 188.94%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
628.47%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 108.76% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-62.18%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
30.50%
Positive short-term CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
33.35%
Below 50% of ON's 2372.29%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
14.54%
Below 50% of ON's 1231.54%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
24.70%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of ON's 34.63%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
528.07%
Dividend/share CAGR of 528.07% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
328.75%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while ON is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
29.76%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 29.76% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
6.63%
Our AR growth while ON is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
5.01%
We show growth while ON is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
28.46%
Asset growth above 1.5x ON's 3.31%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
4.09%
Similar to ON's 4.03%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.47%
We increase R&D while ON cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
3.79%
SG&A growth well above ON's 7.25%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.