PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.23%
Positive revenue growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-0.51%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-13.11%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-10.06%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-10.57%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-8.77%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-8.93%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-1.04%
Share reduction while ON is at 0.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.95%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.30%
Dividend reduction while ON stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
80.35%
Positive OCF growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
166.20%
Positive FCF growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
173.88%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 25.85%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
21.32%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 54.45%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
16.64%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 37.26%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
397.80%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 184.29%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
257.54%
Positive OCF/share growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
23.30%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
850.50%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 72.21% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
12.70%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
21.68%
Positive short-term CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
39.50%
Below 50% of ON's 1021.15%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
20.69%
Below 50% of ON's 5455.66%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
24.51%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to ON's 23.05%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
484.42%
Dividend/share CAGR of 484.42% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
323.55%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while ON is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
28.78%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 28.78% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
6.70%
Our AR growth while ON is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
11.52%
We show growth while ON is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
22.28%
Positive asset growth while ON is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.19%
Positive BV/share change while ON is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
65.84%
We have some new debt while ON reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-6.84%
Our R&D shrinks while ON invests at 2.58%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-5.60%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.