PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.86%
Revenue growth above 1.5x ON's 0.05%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
7.84%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x ON's 5.34%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
55.61%
Positive EBIT growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
50.63%
Positive operating income growth while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
68.30%
Positive net income growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
65.22%
Positive EPS growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
72.73%
Positive diluted EPS growth while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.26%
Share reduction while ON is at 0.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.94%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.26%
Dividend growth of 0.26% while ON is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
50.33%
Positive OCF growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
52.89%
Positive FCF growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
157.09%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 3.56%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
22.78%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to ON's 25.05%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
50.86%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of ON's 64.22%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
190.70%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-5.25%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
34.69%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
682.46%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 108.38% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-7.84%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
90.65%
Below 50% of ON's 312.90%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
63.47%
Below 50% of ON's 219.39%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
22.37%
Below 50% of ON's 808.30%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
34.60%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of ON's 65.24%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
643.71%
Dividend/share CAGR of 643.71% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
113.74%
Dividend/share CAGR of 113.74% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
55.92%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 55.92% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
10.22%
AR growth well above ON's 3.41%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
1.73%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. ON's 4.10%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-2.44%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
1.05%
BV/share growth above 1.5x ON's 0.22%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-11.01%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-5.70%
Our R&D shrinks while ON invests at 7.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-1.30%
We cut SG&A while ON invests at 0.34%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.