PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.65%
Positive revenue growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
5.39%
Positive gross profit growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
44.97%
EBIT growth 50-75% of ON's 65.80%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
40.47%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of ON's 65.80%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
75.78%
Net income growth comparable to ON's 81.16%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
78.95%
EPS growth above 1.5x ON's 50.00%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
76.32%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x ON's 50.00%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-0.88%
Share reduction while ON is at 0.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.13%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.37%
Dividend growth of 0.37% while ON is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
78.07%
Positive OCF growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
98.87%
Positive FCF growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
128.08%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 3.15%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
16.05%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to ON's 15.11%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
30.73%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of ON's 42.85%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
221.77%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with ON's 209.57%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
-1.55%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
60.07%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
530.73%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 123.58% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
26.69%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
61.84%
Positive short-term CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
55.49%
Below 50% of ON's 214.13%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
28.39%
Below 50% of ON's 1905.77%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
34.19%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of ON's 55.62%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
707.91%
Dividend/share CAGR of 707.91% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
113.40%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while ON is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
56.13%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 56.13% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-0.37%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-1.96%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
5.09%
Positive asset growth while ON is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.10%
Positive BV/share change while ON is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
20.99%
We have some new debt while ON reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-3.54%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-0.66%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.