PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.64%
Negative revenue growth while ON stands at 0.76%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-4.17%
Negative gross profit growth while ON is at 8.17%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-13.26%
Negative EBIT growth while ON is at 240.30%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-12.91%
Negative operating income growth while ON is at 240.30%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-20.48%
Negative net income growth while ON stands at 1024.49%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-19.48%
Negative EPS growth while ON is at 1060.71%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-19.74%
Negative diluted EPS growth while ON is at 1071.17%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.21%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.19%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.21%
Dividend growth of 0.21% while ON is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-52.12%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-57.63%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
72.62%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to ON's 70.21%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
16.03%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 57.06%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
10.46%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 22.70%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
89.65%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 36.34%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
1.26%
Positive OCF/share growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
48.44%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 28.05%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
159.95%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x ON's 120.06%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
17.70%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
170.91%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 104.95%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
41.87%
Below 50% of ON's 281.88%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
24.85%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of ON's 49.27%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
2.50%
Below 50% of ON's 11.65%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
1248.38%
Stable or rising dividend while ON is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
182.07%
Dividend/share CAGR of 182.07% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
99.80%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 99.80% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
11.88%
AR growth well above ON's 8.86%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
3.36%
Inventory growth well above ON's 2.33%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-2.12%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.01%
Positive BV/share change while ON is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-0.09%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
8.68%
We increase R&D while ON cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
2.33%
We expand SG&A while ON cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.