PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.00%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-6.56%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-0.77%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-1.89%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
4.76%
Net income growth under 50% of ON's 16.85%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
3.90%
EPS growth under 50% of ON's 18.18%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
5.26%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of ON's 18.18%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.82%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.77%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
11.84%
Dividend growth of 11.84% while ON is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
1.49%
OCF growth under 50% of ON's 22.53%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
-0.31%
Negative FCF growth while ON is at 40.75%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
40.82%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 85.83%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
4.85%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 52.64%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
17.82%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of ON's 34.35%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
149.80%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with ON's 157.20%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
34.74%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 3.50%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
45.06%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 25.15%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
102.44%
Positive 10Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
2.85%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
248.52%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 142.57%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
32.16%
Below 50% of ON's 504.80%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
10.44%
Below 50% of ON's 23.87%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-0.13%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while ON is at 28.49%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
1175.51%
Stable or rising dividend while ON is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
192.39%
Dividend/share CAGR of 192.39% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
80.78%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 80.78% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-21.34%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-4.52%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-1.87%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.58%
Under 50% of ON's 3.51%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-0.29%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-3.16%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-6.68%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.