PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.55%
Positive revenue growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
10.73%
Positive gross profit growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
18.30%
Positive EBIT growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
18.21%
Positive operating income growth while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
5.92%
Net income growth under 50% of ON's 20.08%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
6.06%
EPS growth under 50% of ON's 15.79%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
6.19%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of ON's 22.22%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.40%
Share reduction while ON is at 0.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.39%
Reduced diluted shares while ON is at 0.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.00%
Dividend growth of 0.00% while ON is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
15.35%
OCF growth under 50% of ON's 59.81%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
14.67%
FCF growth under 50% of ON's 69.92%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
55.93%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 142.64%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
27.00%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 94.03%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
20.87%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 85.13%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
47.63%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 315.78%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
55.81%
Below 50% of ON's 508.94%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
27.49%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 130.39%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
150.27%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 2.55% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
171.55%
Below 50% of ON's 1369.86%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
66.59%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 4.60%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
34.68%
Below 50% of ON's 1157.12%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
10.06%
Below 50% of ON's 49.25%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
10.24%
Below 50% of ON's 36.78%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
526.04%
Dividend/share CAGR of 526.04% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
192.90%
Dividend/share CAGR of 192.90% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
66.12%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 66.12% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
9.87%
AR growth well above ON's 2.68%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
5.64%
We show growth while ON is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
2.88%
Similar asset growth to ON's 2.97%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
1.05%
Under 50% of ON's 5.80%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
6.70%
We have some new debt while ON reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
2.44%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. ON's 3.93%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-1.14%
We cut SG&A while ON invests at 6.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.