PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.81%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x ON's 2.53%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
3.64%
Positive gross profit growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
4.17%
Positive EBIT growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
5.51%
Positive operating income growth while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
9.20%
Positive net income growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
10.14%
Positive EPS growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
9.56%
Positive diluted EPS growth while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.21%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.31%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.08%
Dividend growth of 0.08% while ON is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
10.91%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x ON's 8.81%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
21.89%
FCF growth under 50% of ON's 718.96%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
75.75%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 205.65%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
22.11%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 80.54%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
9.87%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 49.31%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
220.59%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x ON's 189.22%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
63.29%
Below 50% of ON's 185.77%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
50.95%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of ON's 87.54%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
255.52%
Positive 10Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
95.58%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
57.62%
Positive short-term CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
27.78%
Below 50% of ON's 271.93%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-2.72%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while ON is at 113.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-6.47%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while ON is at 90.90%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
601.27%
Dividend/share CAGR of 601.27% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
156.24%
Dividend/share CAGR of 156.24% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
102.09%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 102.09% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-5.43%
Firm’s AR is declining while ON shows 0.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-1.88%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
3.50%
Positive asset growth while ON is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
6.11%
Positive BV/share change while ON is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-0.19%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-2.82%
Our R&D shrinks while ON invests at 17.55%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-5.00%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.