PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
17.85%
Revenue growth above 1.5x ON's 8.55%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
17.82%
Gross profit growth similar to ON's 17.87%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
23.29%
EBIT growth below 50% of ON's 176.10%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
31.03%
Operating income growth under 50% of ON's 176.10%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-1.96%
Negative net income growth while ON stands at 11571.43%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-2.65%
Negative EPS growth while ON is at 11570.59%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-2.03%
Negative diluted EPS growth while ON is at 11276.47%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.11%
Share count expansion well above ON's 0.17%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.22%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x ON's 2.00%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
0.13%
Dividend growth of 0.13% while ON is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-16.10%
Negative OCF growth while ON is at 5.76%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-18.43%
Negative FCF growth while ON is at 28.05%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
31.77%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 130.40%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
23.77%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of ON's 46.72%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
-0.08%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
41.36%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with ON's 38.89%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
13.88%
Below 50% of ON's 28.26%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-9.71%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
103.37%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x ON's 92.18%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
88.52%
Below 50% of ON's 249.32%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
13.44%
Below 50% of ON's 51.85%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
7.90%
Below 50% of ON's 180.82%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-7.15%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while ON is at 121.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-18.37%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while ON is at 59.03%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
644.90%
Dividend/share CAGR of 644.90% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
163.60%
Dividend/share CAGR of 163.60% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
79.57%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 79.57% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
18.37%
AR growth well above ON's 9.09%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-3.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
4.37%
Positive asset growth while ON is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
8.79%
BV/share growth above 1.5x ON's 5.58%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
0.01%
We have some new debt while ON reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
1.85%
R&D growth of 1.85% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
1.50%
We expand SG&A while ON cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.