PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.78%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of ON's 12.70%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
10.01%
Gross profit growth under 50% of ON's 22.81%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
15.16%
EBIT growth below 50% of ON's 124.15%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
14.13%
Operating income growth under 50% of ON's 124.15%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
10.15%
Net income growth under 50% of ON's 104.78%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
10.00%
EPS growth under 50% of ON's 95.45%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
9.63%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of ON's 110.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.11%
Share reduction more than 1.5x ON's 3.46%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.21%
Slight or no buyback while ON is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
0.10%
Dividend growth of 0.10% while ON is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
14.65%
OCF growth under 50% of ON's 123.34%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
12.52%
FCF growth under 50% of ON's 169.88%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
65.88%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of ON's 92.33%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
52.11%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of ON's 84.54%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
20.69%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x ON's 14.51%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
320.99%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x ON's 274.34%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
115.68%
Below 50% of ON's 354.31%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
22.95%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 81.45%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
259.89%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of ON's 459.95%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
156.30%
Below 50% of ON's 611.52%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
45.48%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 18.35%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
28.12%
Below 50% of ON's 152.42%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
21.70%
Below 50% of ON's 115.84%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
11.02%
Below 50% of ON's 22.96%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
686.53%
Dividend/share CAGR of 686.53% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
168.06%
Dividend/share CAGR of 168.06% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
64.54%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 64.54% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
0.44%
Our AR growth while ON is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-1.80%
Inventory is declining while ON stands at 1.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
4.91%
Positive asset growth while ON is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
9.59%
BV/share growth above 1.5x ON's 0.76%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
0.02%
We have some new debt while ON reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
1.30%
We increase R&D while ON cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.