PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.26%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of ON's 7.20%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
5.32%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of ON's 7.89%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
5.90%
Positive EBIT growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
6.24%
Positive operating income growth while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
4.09%
Positive net income growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
4.20%
Positive EPS growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
3.81%
Positive diluted EPS growth while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.33%
Share reduction while ON is at 0.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.43%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.04%
Dividend growth of 0.04% while ON is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-17.54%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-31.16%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
93.65%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 193.03%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
52.48%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to ON's 51.02%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
44.72%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to ON's 46.76%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
224.56%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 645.30%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
108.31%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 22.39%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
0.26%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 79.33%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
536.51%
Below 50% of ON's 6814.64%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
134.40%
Below 50% of ON's 370.43%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
78.80%
Below 50% of ON's 324.75%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
56.50%
Below 50% of ON's 271.83%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
42.19%
Below 50% of ON's 149.14%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
69.13%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x ON's 56.15%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
573.58%
Dividend/share CAGR of 573.58% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
129.97%
Dividend/share CAGR of 129.97% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
49.53%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 49.53% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
22.01%
AR growth well above ON's 24.97%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
6.75%
Inventory growth well above ON's 4.49%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-2.19%
Negative asset growth while ON invests at 5.64%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.86%
Under 50% of ON's 7.59%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-6.43%
We’re deleveraging while ON stands at 0.21%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
5.88%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. ON's 3.06%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.