PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.04%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-13.64%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-18.51%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-18.97%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-19.78%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-20.21%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-19.46%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.11%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
4.88%
Dividend growth of 4.88% while ON is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-0.67%
Negative OCF growth while ON is at 7.87%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
75.57%
FCF growth under 50% of ON's 242.07%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
61.04%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 190.53%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
15.12%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 30.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
1.24%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 34.06%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
91.92%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 397.45%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-5.86%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while ON is at 41.38%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-8.36%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ON stands at 46.66%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
220.89%
Below 50% of ON's 1288.13%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
16.14%
Below 50% of ON's 230.90%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-17.80%
Negative 3Y CAGR while ON is 507.44%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
87.00%
Below 50% of ON's 448.28%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
97.18%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of ON's 138.96%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
86.15%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of ON's 111.31%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
333.29%
Dividend/share CAGR of 333.29% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
68.41%
Dividend/share CAGR of 68.41% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
27.57%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 27.57% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-9.56%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
2.33%
Inventory growth well above ON's 1.30%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
2.24%
Positive asset growth while ON is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.60%
Under 50% of ON's 4.71%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
5.05%
We have some new debt while ON reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-2.34%
Our R&D shrinks while ON invests at 4.74%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-3.10%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.