205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.39%
Positive revenue growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
0.39%
Positive gross profit growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
0.39%
Positive EBIT growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
0.39%
Positive operating income growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
13.82%
Positive net income growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.10%
Slight or no buybacks while QCOM is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.10%
Slight or no buyback while QCOM is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.16%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QCOM's 161.71%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
4.16%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QCOM's 118.62%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
4.16%
Positive 3Y CAGR while QCOM is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
116.80%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of QCOM's 231.57%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
116.80%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of QCOM's 225.62%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
116.80%
Positive short-term CAGR while QCOM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.