PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.18%
Positive revenue growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
6.18%
Positive gross profit growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
6.18%
Positive EBIT growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
6.18%
Positive operating income growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
7.37%
Positive net income growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
16.67%
Positive EPS growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
16.67%
Positive diluted EPS growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.39%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QCOM's 161.71%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
20.39%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QCOM's 118.62%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
20.39%
Positive 3Y CAGR while QCOM is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
617.50%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x QCOM's 231.57% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
617.50%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x QCOM's 225.62%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
617.50%
Positive short-term CAGR while QCOM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.00%
Below 50% of QCOM's 88.30%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
8.00%
Below 50% of QCOM's 36.29%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
8.00%
Below 50% of QCOM's 18.12%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.