PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.61%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-80.85%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-97.57%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-97.57%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-38.74%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-37.50%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-37.50%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-13.82%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-13.82%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.67%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QCOM's 161.71%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
39.67%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QCOM's 118.62%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
34.10%
Positive 3Y CAGR while QCOM is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
184.89%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of QCOM's 231.57%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
184.89%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of QCOM's 225.62%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
405.40%
Positive short-term CAGR while QCOM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.00%
Below 50% of QCOM's 18.12%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.