PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
20.82%
Positive revenue growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
177.57%
Positive gross profit growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
251.26%
Positive EBIT growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
251.26%
Positive operating income growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-44.77%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-60.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-60.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
19.85%
Slight or no buybacks while QCOM is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
19.85%
Slight or no buyback while QCOM is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
58.73%
Dividend growth above 1.5x QCOM's 4.33%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.52%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QCOM's 161.71%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
39.52%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QCOM's 118.62%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
28.30%
Positive 3Y CAGR while QCOM is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
179.25%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of QCOM's 231.57%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
179.25%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of QCOM's 225.62%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
24.43%
Positive short-term CAGR while QCOM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
57.92%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x QCOM's 20.67%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
57.92%
Below 50% of QCOM's 749.40%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
32.66%
Below 50% of QCOM's 74.21%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-14.28%
Cut dividends over 10 years while QCOM stands at 88.30%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-14.28%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while QCOM stands at 36.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-14.28%
Negative near-term dividend growth while QCOM invests at 18.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
4.15%
Our AR growth while QCOM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-9.16%
Inventory is declining while QCOM stands at 2.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.64%
Positive asset growth while QCOM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-15.87%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
2.31%
Debt growth far above QCOM's 1.13%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.37%
SG&A declining or stable vs. QCOM's 9.21%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.