PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-17.37%
Negative revenue growth while QCOM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-66.29%
Negative gross profit growth while QCOM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-101.44%
Negative EBIT growth while QCOM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-101.44%
Negative operating income growth while QCOM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-63.79%
Negative net income growth while QCOM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-65.00%
Negative EPS growth while QCOM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-65.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while QCOM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-2.12%
Share reduction while QCOM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-2.12%
Reduced diluted shares while QCOM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
3.02%
Dividend growth of 3.02% while QCOM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-74.43%
Negative OCF growth while QCOM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-1004.76%
Negative FCF growth while QCOM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
24.33%
10Y CAGR of 24.33% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
24.33%
5Y CAGR of 24.33% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
13.75%
3Y CAGR of 13.75% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
192.70%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 192.70% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
192.70%
Net income/share CAGR of 192.70% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
-83.61%
Negative 3Y CAGR while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.60%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 76.60% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-2.85%
Firm’s AR is declining while QCOM shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
6.52%
Inventory growth of 6.52% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-1.34%
Negative asset growth while QCOM invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
1.80%
BV/share growth of 1.80% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
-3.06%
We’re deleveraging while QCOM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.50%
SG&A growth of 7.50% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.