PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.65%
Revenue growth of 3.65% while QCOM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
12.33%
Gross profit growth of 12.33% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
1050.00%
EBIT growth of 1050.00% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
1050.00%
Operating income growth of 1050.00% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this modest edge can become significant.
-15.38%
Negative net income growth while QCOM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.01%
Share change of 0.01% while QCOM is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.01%
Diluted share change of 0.01% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-0.01%
Dividend reduction while QCOM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
69.74%
OCF growth of 69.74% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
20.39%
FCF growth of 20.39% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
18.60%
10Y CAGR of 18.60% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
18.60%
5Y CAGR of 18.60% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
10.01%
3Y CAGR of 10.01% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.11%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while QCOM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-17.11%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-78.81%
Negative 3Y CAGR while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.59%
Dividend/share CAGR of 76.59% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
76.59%
Dividend/share CAGR of 76.59% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
63.51%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 63.51% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
6.33%
AR growth of 6.33% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
3.96%
Inventory growth of 3.96% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
2.15%
Asset growth of 2.15% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
-0.58%
We have a declining book value while QCOM shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
4.84%
Debt growth of 4.84% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.10%
SG&A growth of 5.10% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.