PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.53%
Revenue growth of 5.53% while QCOM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
-4.88%
Negative gross profit growth while QCOM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-115.79%
Negative EBIT growth while QCOM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-115.79%
Negative operating income growth while QCOM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-163.64%
Negative net income growth while QCOM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-220.00%
Negative EPS growth while QCOM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-220.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while QCOM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.25%
Share change of 0.25% while QCOM is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.25%
Diluted share change of 0.25% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-4.40%
Dividend reduction while QCOM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-112.40%
Negative OCF growth while QCOM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-101.65%
Negative FCF growth while QCOM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
29.67%
10Y CAGR of 29.67% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
29.67%
5Y CAGR of 29.67% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
12.58%
3Y CAGR of 12.58% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
92.23%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 92.23% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
92.23%
Net income/share CAGR of 92.23% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
-111.86%
Negative 3Y CAGR while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.31%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 56.31% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
19.82%
AR growth of 19.82% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
0.34%
Inventory growth of 0.34% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
2.77%
Asset growth of 2.77% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
-1.22%
We have a declining book value while QCOM shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
16.84%
Debt growth of 16.84% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.94%
SG&A growth of 1.94% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.