PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.70%
Revenue growth above 1.5x QCOM's 0.86%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
171.79%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x QCOM's 0.86%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-1233.33%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-1233.33%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-700.00%
Negative net income growth while QCOM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-445.24%
Negative EPS growth while QCOM is at 50.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-445.24%
Negative diluted EPS growth while QCOM is at 50.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.04%
Share change of 0.04% while QCOM is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.04%
Diluted share change of 0.04% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-0.04%
Dividend reduction while QCOM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
3256.25%
OCF growth of 3256.25% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
223.77%
FCF growth of 223.77% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
34.49%
10Y CAGR of 34.49% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
34.49%
5Y CAGR of 34.49% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
10.19%
3Y CAGR of 10.19% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.93%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while QCOM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-25.93%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-169.92%
Negative 3Y CAGR while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
52.64%
Equity/share CAGR of 52.64% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
52.64%
Equity/share CAGR of 52.64% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
31.37%
Equity/share CAGR of 31.37% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
-15.63%
Cut dividends over 10 years while QCOM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-15.63%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while QCOM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
56.25%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 56.25% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-19.11%
Firm’s AR is declining while QCOM shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-1.00%
Inventory is declining while QCOM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
1.45%
Asset growth of 1.45% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
-3.32%
We have a declining book value while QCOM shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-4.34%
We’re deleveraging while QCOM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.16%
SG&A growth of 10.16% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.