205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.73%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of QCOM's 22.67%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
14.88%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of QCOM's 20.16%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
23.57%
EBIT growth below 50% of QCOM's 116.67%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
23.57%
Operating income growth under 50% of QCOM's 116.67%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
38.27%
Net income growth under 50% of QCOM's 125.00%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
60.00%
EPS growth under 50% of QCOM's 126.09%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
60.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of QCOM's 126.09%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-10.96%
Share reduction while QCOM is at 0.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-10.96%
Reduced diluted shares while QCOM is at 0.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
22.52%
Dividend growth of 22.52% while QCOM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
121.15%
OCF growth under 50% of QCOM's 493.33%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
219.05%
FCF growth above 1.5x QCOM's 129.09%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
57.39%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QCOM's 197.39%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
30.73%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QCOM's 197.39%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
32.70%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QCOM's 197.39%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
78.94%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 78.94% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
747.03%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 747.03% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
18.05%
Net income/share CAGR of 18.05% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
921.88%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 921.88% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.89%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while QCOM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
77.23%
Dividend/share CAGR of 77.23% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
64.10%
Dividend/share CAGR of 64.10% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
0.36%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 0.36% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
3.67%
Our AR growth while QCOM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
3.00%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. QCOM's 15.79%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
2.34%
Asset growth well under 50% of QCOM's 23.78%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
18.75%
BV/share growth above 1.5x QCOM's 2.28%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-1.71%
We’re deleveraging while QCOM stands at 191.18%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.28%
SG&A growth well above QCOM's 3.33%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.