PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.49%
Revenue growth under 50% of QCOM's 26.07%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
6.95%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of QCOM's 12.92%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
39.71%
EBIT growth above 1.5x QCOM's 9.43%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
39.71%
Operating income growth above 1.5x QCOM's 9.43%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
37.31%
Net income growth above 1.5x QCOM's 10.00%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
33.33%
EPS growth of 33.33% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
33.33%
Diluted EPS growth of 33.33% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
0.82%
Share change of 0.82% while QCOM is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.55%
Diluted share change of 0.55% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-0.81%
Dividend reduction while QCOM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-29.54%
Negative OCF growth while QCOM is at 435.71%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-82.21%
Negative FCF growth while QCOM is at 81.60%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
65.84%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QCOM's 279.73%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
35.07%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QCOM's 279.73%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
26.89%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QCOM's 94.90%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1140.12%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 1140.12% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
1129.69%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 1129.69% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
52.11%
Net income/share CAGR of 52.11% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
199.89%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 199.89% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.43%
Equity/share CAGR of 16.43% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
10.94%
Dividend/share CAGR of 10.94% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
2.72%
Dividend/share CAGR of 2.72% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-88.41%
Negative near-term dividend growth while QCOM invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
7.11%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. QCOM's 26.76%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
4.86%
Inventory growth well above QCOM's 8.43%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
3.78%
Asset growth at 50-75% of QCOM's 5.41%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
6.90%
BV/share growth above 1.5x QCOM's 3.29%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-1.41%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.17%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.