PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.55%
Revenue growth under 50% of QCOM's 5.76%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
1.98%
Gross profit growth under 50% of QCOM's 19.61%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-0.34%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-0.34%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
1.09%
Net income growth under 50% of QCOM's 16.36%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
8.33%
EPS growth under 50% of QCOM's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
8.33%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of QCOM's 100.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.53%
Slight or no buybacks while QCOM is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.43%
Slight or no buyback while QCOM is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
28.73%
Dividend growth of 28.73% while QCOM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
36.43%
OCF growth above 1.5x QCOM's 14.67%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
170.27%
Positive FCF growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
75.71%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QCOM's 527.50%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
25.80%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QCOM's 527.50%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
21.91%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QCOM's 222.08%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32045.29%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 32045.29% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
282.66%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 282.66% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
115.17%
Net income/share CAGR of 115.17% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
232.45%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 232.45% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.64%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while QCOM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
7.50%
Equity/share CAGR of 7.50% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.23%
Dividend/share CAGR of 32.23% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-78.93%
Negative near-term dividend growth while QCOM invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
0.83%
AR growth well above QCOM's 0.85%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-1.58%
Inventory is declining while QCOM stands at 1.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.49%
Asset growth at 75-90% of QCOM's 3.27%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
6.43%
Under 50% of QCOM's 62.35%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-6.04%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.61%
SG&A declining or stable vs. QCOM's 25.23%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.