PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.88%
Positive revenue growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
27.53%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x QCOM's 4.20%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-95.92%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-95.92%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
22.34%
Net income growth under 50% of QCOM's 447.06%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
36.36%
EPS growth under 50% of QCOM's 470.37%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
36.36%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of QCOM's 470.37%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.19%
Slight or no buybacks while QCOM is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.28%
Slight or no buyback while QCOM is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-0.19%
Dividend reduction while QCOM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-45.94%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-90.99%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
103.46%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QCOM's 621.56%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
63.64%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QCOM's 621.56%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
9.95%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QCOM's 232.15%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
169.26%
OCF/share CAGR of 169.26% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
1795.38%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1540.34%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 1540.34% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
1453.85%
Net income/share CAGR of 1453.85% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
274.20%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of QCOM's 482.73%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.10%
Equity/share CAGR of 16.10% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
11.87%
Below 50% of QCOM's 333.22%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.83%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while QCOM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-42.43%
Negative near-term dividend growth while QCOM invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
15.40%
AR growth well above QCOM's 0.79%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
7.03%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. QCOM's 41.67%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
6.18%
Positive asset growth while QCOM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
7.50%
50-75% of QCOM's 11.33%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
3.05%
Debt growth far above QCOM's 4.01%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.80%
We cut SG&A while QCOM invests at 52.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.