PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.55%
Positive revenue growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
10.73%
Positive gross profit growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
18.30%
Positive EBIT growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
18.21%
Positive operating income growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
5.92%
Net income growth at 50-75% of QCOM's 9.82%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
6.06%
EPS growth at 50-75% of QCOM's 10.87%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
6.19%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of QCOM's 8.70%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
-0.40%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.39%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.00%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while QCOM cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
15.35%
Positive OCF growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
14.67%
Positive FCF growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
55.93%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QCOM's 153.67%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
27.00%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x QCOM's 16.66%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
20.87%
Positive 3Y CAGR while QCOM is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
47.63%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
55.81%
Positive OCF/share growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
27.49%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
150.27%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x QCOM's 15.88% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
171.55%
Positive 5Y CAGR while QCOM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
66.59%
Positive short-term CAGR while QCOM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
34.68%
Below 50% of QCOM's 134.24%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
10.06%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of QCOM's 13.02%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
10.24%
Positive short-term equity growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
526.04%
Dividend/share CAGR of 526.04% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
192.90%
5Y dividend/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x QCOM's 145.27%. Bruce Berkowitz verifies that high dividend hikes remain sustainable, not a sign of over-distribution.
66.12%
3Y dividend/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x QCOM's 51.93%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the company's short-term profits or payout policy justify these higher hikes.
9.87%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. QCOM's 101.49%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
5.64%
Inventory growth well above QCOM's 8.17%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
2.88%
Asset growth well under 50% of QCOM's 7.09%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.05%
BV/share growth above 1.5x QCOM's 0.48%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
6.70%
Debt growth far above QCOM's 2.17%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
2.44%
R&D dropping or stable vs. QCOM's 5.72%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
-1.14%
We cut SG&A while QCOM invests at 4.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.