PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.02%
Positive revenue growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
7.03%
Positive gross profit growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
10.15%
EBIT growth below 50% of QCOM's 1420.69%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
10.59%
Operating income growth under 50% of QCOM's 1420.69%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
2.86%
Net income growth under 50% of QCOM's 106.10%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
3.62%
EPS growth under 50% of QCOM's 105.46%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
3.70%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of QCOM's 105.46%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.61%
Share reduction while QCOM is at 0.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.80%
Reduced diluted shares while QCOM is at 1.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.21%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
64.21%
Positive OCF growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
70.86%
Positive FCF growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
61.96%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of QCOM's 120.27%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
48.84%
Positive 5Y CAGR while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
31.55%
Positive 3Y CAGR while QCOM is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
375.35%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
205.86%
Positive OCF/share growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
135.70%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of QCOM's 187.04%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
222.83%
Positive 10Y CAGR while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
140.33%
Positive 5Y CAGR while QCOM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
113.67%
Positive short-term CAGR while QCOM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
43.90%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of QCOM's 67.92%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
8.47%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
10.29%
Positive short-term equity growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
520.27%
Dividend/share CAGR of 520.27% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
121.41%
Similar 5Y dividend/share CAGR to QCOM's 127.81%. Walter Schloss sees parallel philosophies in mid-term capital returns.
81.19%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x QCOM's 36.33%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
6.67%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. QCOM's 15.79%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
2.85%
We show growth while QCOM is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
5.83%
Positive asset growth while QCOM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
0.54%
Positive BV/share change while QCOM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
24.23%
Debt growth far above QCOM's 1.09%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-0.26%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
1.85%
SG&A declining or stable vs. QCOM's 12.42%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.