PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.78%
Positive revenue growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
10.01%
Positive gross profit growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
15.16%
Positive EBIT growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
14.13%
Positive operating income growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
10.15%
Positive net income growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
10.00%
Positive EPS growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
9.63%
Positive diluted EPS growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.11%
Slight or no buybacks while QCOM is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.21%
Slight or no buyback while QCOM is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
0.10%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while QCOM cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
14.65%
Positive OCF growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
12.52%
Positive FCF growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
65.88%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QCOM's 198.94%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
52.11%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of QCOM's 87.61%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
20.69%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QCOM's 97.29%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
320.99%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x QCOM's 140.36%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
115.68%
Below 50% of QCOM's 418.39%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
22.95%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of QCOM's 637.92%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
259.89%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x QCOM's 157.48% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
156.30%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x QCOM's 98.67%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
45.48%
Below 50% of QCOM's 534.92%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
28.12%
Positive growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
21.70%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
11.02%
Positive short-term equity growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
686.53%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x QCOM's 239.09%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
168.06%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x QCOM's 35.68%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
64.54%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x QCOM's 13.62%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
0.44%
Our AR growth while QCOM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-1.80%
Inventory is declining while QCOM stands at 4.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
4.91%
Positive asset growth while QCOM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
9.59%
BV/share growth above 1.5x QCOM's 0.68%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
0.02%
Debt growth far above QCOM's 0.03%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
1.30%
R&D dropping or stable vs. QCOM's 7.68%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.