PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.26%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x QCOM's 4.29%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
5.32%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x QCOM's 1.78%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
5.90%
Positive EBIT growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
6.24%
Positive operating income growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
4.09%
Positive net income growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
4.20%
Positive EPS growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
3.81%
Positive diluted EPS growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.33%
Share reduction while QCOM is at 0.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.43%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.04%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while QCOM cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-17.54%
Negative OCF growth while QCOM is at 31.16%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-31.16%
Negative FCF growth while QCOM is at 49.73%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
93.65%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QCOM's 240.89%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
52.48%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QCOM's 192.21%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
44.72%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QCOM's 141.62%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
224.56%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x QCOM's 115.69%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
108.31%
Below 50% of QCOM's 334.62%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
0.26%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of QCOM's 266.38%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
536.51%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x QCOM's 98.58% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
134.40%
Below 50% of QCOM's 414.29%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
78.80%
Below 50% of QCOM's 377.15%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
56.50%
Positive growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
42.19%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
69.13%
Below 50% of QCOM's 271.72%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
573.58%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x QCOM's 214.20%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
129.97%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x QCOM's 28.10%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
49.53%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x QCOM's 9.54%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
22.01%
AR growth well above QCOM's 1.29%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
6.75%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. QCOM's 17.97%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-2.19%
Negative asset growth while QCOM invests at 3.46%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.86%
Under 50% of QCOM's 17.50%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-6.43%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
5.88%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. QCOM's 5.39%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.