PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.56%
Positive revenue growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-0.22%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-0.70%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-1.65%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
0.17%
Net income growth under 50% of QCOM's 27.13%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
1.21%
EPS growth under 50% of QCOM's 27.20%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
0.82%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of QCOM's 28.02%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.76%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.75%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.09%
Dividend reduction while QCOM stands at 10.50%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
56.45%
OCF growth above 1.5x QCOM's 7.30%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
68.74%
FCF growth above 1.5x QCOM's 6.07%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
91.35%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QCOM's 261.35%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
37.79%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QCOM's 168.22%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
42.33%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x QCOM's 23.11%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
184.81%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of QCOM's 379.94%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
73.82%
Below 50% of QCOM's 4550.68%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
42.20%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
262.30%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of QCOM's 372.36%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
93.27%
Below 50% of QCOM's 467.38%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
64.93%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of QCOM's 88.27%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
57.46%
Positive growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
42.87%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
65.35%
Below 50% of QCOM's 218.63%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
570.52%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x QCOM's 200.00%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
129.76%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x QCOM's 31.42%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
49.28%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x QCOM's 20.97%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-6.85%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
9.32%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. QCOM's 18.95%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
5.40%
Asset growth at 75-90% of QCOM's 6.14%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
3.73%
Under 50% of QCOM's 20.73%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
9.57%
We have some new debt while QCOM reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
4.11%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. QCOM's 0.88%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
2.13%
SG&A declining or stable vs. QCOM's 4.97%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.