PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.47%
Positive revenue growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
1.64%
Positive gross profit growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
3.82%
Positive EBIT growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1.96%
Positive operating income growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
0.82%
Positive net income growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
0.53%
Positive EPS growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1.08%
Positive diluted EPS growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.11%
Slight or no buybacks while QCOM is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.11%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
20.60%
Positive OCF growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-126.40%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
80.64%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of QCOM's 133.69%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
21.37%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QCOM's 134.12%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
41.12%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of QCOM's 81.48%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
152.14%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x QCOM's 1.45%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-17.56%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while QCOM is at 274.97%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-17.95%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while QCOM stands at 37.31%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
216.94%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x QCOM's 40.91% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
31.88%
Below 50% of QCOM's 523.37%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
25.88%
Below 50% of QCOM's 271.61%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
74.95%
Positive growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
61.29%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x QCOM's 9.82%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
110.37%
Below 50% of QCOM's 560.23%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
342.27%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x QCOM's 198.58%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
99.75%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x QCOM's 31.07%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
37.90%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x QCOM's 20.74%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
4.21%
Our AR growth while QCOM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
13.41%
We show growth while QCOM is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
5.88%
Positive asset growth while QCOM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.46%
75-90% of QCOM's 5.28%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
10.79%
We have some new debt while QCOM reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
4.84%
We increase R&D while QCOM cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-2.74%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.