PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
18.34%
Positive revenue growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
40.10%
Positive gross profit growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
452.27%
EBIT growth 50-75% of QRVO's 810.08%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
452.27%
Operating income growth above 1.5x QRVO's 6.61%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
350.00%
Positive net income growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
350.00%
Positive EPS growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
350.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.11%
Dividend growth of 18.11% while QRVO is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
30.74%
Positive OCF growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
19.32%
Positive FCF growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-23.21%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while QRVO stands at 95.48%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-31.88%
Negative 5Y CAGR while QRVO stands at 27.97%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-23.85%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
92.96%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of QRVO's 108.03%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
-48.34%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while QRVO is at 5.08%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
5.65%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-12.50%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while QRVO is at 1921.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-69.24%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-75.71%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
285.89%
Positive growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
105.52%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
42.79%
Positive short-term equity growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
15.92%
Dividend/share CAGR of 15.92% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
6.77%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while QRVO is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
8.43%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 8.43% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
22.90%
Our AR growth while QRVO is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
6.77%
We show growth while QRVO is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-3.53%
Negative asset growth while QRVO invests at 1.09%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-3.98%
We have a declining book value while QRVO shows 3.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.12%
We increase R&D while QRVO cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
11.32%
SG&A growth well above QRVO's 19.11%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.