PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.28%
Positive revenue growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
0.54%
Positive gross profit growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
10.98%
EBIT growth below 50% of QRVO's 810.08%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
10.98%
Operating income growth above 1.5x QRVO's 6.61%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
27.66%
Positive net income growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
32.00%
Positive EPS growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
28.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-1.93%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.28%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.79%
Dividend reduction while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
86.17%
Positive OCF growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
308.00%
Positive FCF growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
7.93%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 95.48%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
32.39%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x QRVO's 27.97%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
69.82%
Positive 3Y CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
102.84%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with QRVO's 108.03%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
72.68%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x QRVO's 5.08%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
172.49%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
158.75%
Below 50% of QRVO's 1921.69%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
36.06%
Positive 5Y CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
564.91%
Positive short-term CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
285.05%
Positive growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
58.13%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
7.89%
Positive short-term equity growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
39.88%
Dividend/share CAGR of 39.88% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
5.99%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while QRVO is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
-6.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while QRVO invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
1.81%
Our AR growth while QRVO is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
5.53%
We show growth while QRVO is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
0.54%
Asset growth well under 50% of QRVO's 1.09%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
5.72%
BV/share growth above 1.5x QRVO's 3.14%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-51.52%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-6.03%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-6.93%
We cut SG&A while QRVO invests at 19.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.