PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.92%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-9.52%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-17.63%
Negative EBIT growth while QRVO is at 810.08%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-17.63%
Negative operating income growth while QRVO is at 6.61%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-4.84%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-2.13%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.52%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-2.41%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
29.35%
Dividend growth of 29.35% while QRVO is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
101.67%
Positive OCF growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
341.26%
Positive FCF growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
204.26%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x QRVO's 95.48%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
111.21%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x QRVO's 27.97%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
120.70%
Positive 3Y CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
37.20%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 108.03%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
18.07%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x QRVO's 5.08%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
39.81%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
2571.27%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x QRVO's 1921.69%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
727.64%
Positive 5Y CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
129.87%
Positive short-term CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
187.22%
Positive growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
4.23%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
69.04%
Positive short-term equity growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
87.75%
Dividend/share CAGR of 87.75% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
75.60%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while QRVO is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
184.42%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 184.42% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-15.08%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-3.62%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-5.78%
Negative asset growth while QRVO invests at 1.09%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-3.10%
We have a declining book value while QRVO shows 3.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.46%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-1.39%
We cut SG&A while QRVO invests at 19.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.