PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.41%
Positive revenue growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-0.40%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
3.22%
EBIT growth below 50% of QRVO's 810.08%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
3.22%
Operating income growth under 50% of QRVO's 6.61%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-11.18%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-10.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-10.20%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.53%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.52%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.23%
Dividend reduction while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-19.03%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-41.00%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
83.22%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of QRVO's 95.48%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
87.61%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x QRVO's 27.97%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
27.99%
Positive 3Y CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
99.01%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with QRVO's 108.03%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
79.80%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x QRVO's 5.08%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-22.36%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
1239.80%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of QRVO's 1921.69%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
536.36%
Positive 5Y CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
15.83%
Positive short-term CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
98.52%
Positive growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
19.49%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
7.75%
Positive short-term equity growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
373.94%
Dividend/share CAGR of 373.94% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
367.18%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while QRVO is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
298.29%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 298.29% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
8.51%
Our AR growth while QRVO is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
4.63%
We show growth while QRVO is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
0.36%
Asset growth well under 50% of QRVO's 1.09%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.83%
50-75% of QRVO's 3.14%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.06%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-1.61%
We cut SG&A while QRVO invests at 19.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.