PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
17.22%
Positive revenue growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
31.76%
Positive gross profit growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
80.61%
EBIT growth below 50% of QRVO's 810.08%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
122.45%
Operating income growth above 1.5x QRVO's 6.61%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
106.92%
Positive net income growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
104.76%
Positive EPS growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
110.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.95%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.31%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.23%
Dividend growth of 0.23% while QRVO is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
49.73%
Positive OCF growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
19.45%
Positive FCF growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
61.72%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of QRVO's 95.48%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
22.16%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of QRVO's 27.97%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
-8.11%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
110.74%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with QRVO's 108.03%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
22.04%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x QRVO's 5.08%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
138.85%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
79.23%
Below 50% of QRVO's 1921.69%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
31.73%
Positive 5Y CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-8.03%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
59.53%
Positive growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
0.89%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-5.83%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
460.05%
Dividend/share CAGR of 460.05% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
428.42%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while QRVO is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
260.00%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 260.00% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
15.35%
Our AR growth while QRVO is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
4.99%
We show growth while QRVO is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
3.41%
Asset growth above 1.5x QRVO's 1.09%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
3.42%
Similar to QRVO's 3.14%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.27%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
3.98%
SG&A declining or stable vs. QRVO's 19.11%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.