PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-8.74%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-1.10%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
3.79%
EBIT growth below 50% of QRVO's 810.08%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
8.77%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x QRVO's 6.61%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
-11.07%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-11.54%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-15.38%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.62%
Slight or no buybacks while QRVO is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
1.04%
Slight or no buyback while QRVO is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
0.42%
Dividend growth of 0.42% while QRVO is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-53.76%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-57.70%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
183.96%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x QRVO's 95.48%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
23.39%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of QRVO's 27.97%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
66.90%
Positive 3Y CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
152.15%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x QRVO's 108.03%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
2.25%
Below 50% of QRVO's 5.08%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
99.54%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1259.23%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of QRVO's 1921.69%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
-35.21%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
1638.85%
Positive short-term CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
55.33%
Positive growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
23.79%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
34.09%
Positive short-term equity growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
776.07%
Dividend/share CAGR of 776.07% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
324.16%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while QRVO is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
54.27%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 54.27% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-4.34%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
3.64%
We show growth while QRVO is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-2.38%
Negative asset growth while QRVO invests at 1.09%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.47%
Under 50% of QRVO's 3.14%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-5.49%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
7.38%
We increase R&D while QRVO cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
4.05%
SG&A declining or stable vs. QRVO's 19.11%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.