PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.35%
Positive revenue growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
8.67%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x QRVO's 2.74%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
19.59%
EBIT growth of 19.59% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
19.65%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of QRVO's 28.74%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
20.94%
Net income growth above 1.5x QRVO's 5.82%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
22.22%
Positive EPS growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
22.58%
Positive diluted EPS growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-1.03%
Share reduction while QRVO is at 101.59%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.10%
Reduced diluted shares while QRVO is at 106.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.21%
Dividend reduction while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
78.45%
OCF growth under 50% of QRVO's 227.17%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
84.17%
FCF growth under 50% of QRVO's 1046.98%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
75.81%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
43.93%
Positive 5Y CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
9.01%
Positive 3Y CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
139.61%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
96.33%
Positive OCF/share growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
31.16%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
139.45%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of QRVO's 204.99%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
81.78%
Below 50% of QRVO's 204.99%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
48.33%
Below 50% of QRVO's 204.99%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
32.52%
Positive growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
31.35%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
2.49%
Positive short-term equity growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
1346.20%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1346.20% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
173.68%
Dividend/share CAGR of 173.68% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
132.62%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 132.62% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-3.27%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
0.40%
We show growth while QRVO is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
0.51%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x QRVO's 0.36%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
1.09%
Positive BV/share change while QRVO is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-0.06%
We’re deleveraging while QRVO stands at 1.56%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-4.87%
Our R&D shrinks while QRVO invests at 2.39%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-1.91%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.