PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.64%
Negative revenue growth while QRVO stands at 23.56%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-4.17%
Negative gross profit growth while QRVO is at 43.30%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-13.26%
Negative EBIT growth while QRVO is at 10311.41%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-12.91%
Negative operating income growth while QRVO is at 7454.85%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-20.48%
Negative net income growth while QRVO stands at 3794.74%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-19.48%
Negative EPS growth while QRVO is at 3814.29%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-19.74%
Negative diluted EPS growth while QRVO is at 3814.29%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.21%
Share reduction while QRVO is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.19%
Reduced diluted shares while QRVO is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.21%
Dividend growth of 0.21% while QRVO is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-52.12%
Negative OCF growth while QRVO is at 14.31%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-57.63%
Negative FCF growth while QRVO is at 11.34%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
72.62%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
16.03%
Positive 5Y CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
10.46%
Positive 3Y CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
89.65%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of QRVO's 136.71%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
1.26%
Below 50% of QRVO's 136.71%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
48.44%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 136.71%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
159.95%
Below 50% of QRVO's 1070.59%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
17.70%
Below 50% of QRVO's 1070.59%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
170.91%
Below 50% of QRVO's 1070.59%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
41.87%
Positive growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
24.85%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
2.50%
Positive short-term equity growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
1248.38%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1248.38% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
182.07%
Dividend/share CAGR of 182.07% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
99.80%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 99.80% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
11.88%
AR growth well above QRVO's 22.20%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
3.36%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. QRVO's 13.69%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-2.12%
Negative asset growth while QRVO invests at 1.53%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.01%
Under 50% of QRVO's 11.47%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-0.09%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
8.68%
We increase R&D while QRVO cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
2.33%
SG&A declining or stable vs. QRVO's 12.62%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.