PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.81%
Revenue growth above 1.5x QRVO's 5.15%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
9.81%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x QRVO's 1.91%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
15.53%
EBIT growth below 50% of QRVO's 494.84%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
15.39%
Operating income growth under 50% of QRVO's 1451.24%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
15.19%
Net income growth under 50% of QRVO's 118.47%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
15.71%
EPS growth under 50% of QRVO's 132.35%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
14.49%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of QRVO's 123.48%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.32%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.20%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.06%
Dividend growth of 0.06% while QRVO is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
95.43%
OCF growth above 1.5x QRVO's 19.35%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
115.37%
FCF growth above 1.5x QRVO's 70.08%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
37.03%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of QRVO's 64.31%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
9.05%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 64.31%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
18.09%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 64.31%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
158.94%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 4189.29%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
95.19%
Below 50% of QRVO's 4189.29%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
74.36%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 4189.29%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-46.89%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while QRVO is at 113.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
40.42%
Below 50% of QRVO's 113.15%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
36.42%
Below 50% of QRVO's 113.15%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
20.58%
Below 50% of QRVO's 756.42%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
5.27%
Below 50% of QRVO's 756.42%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-1.05%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while QRVO is at 756.42%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
1158.01%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1158.01% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
193.41%
Dividend/share CAGR of 193.41% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
35.90%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 35.90% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
6.23%
AR growth well above QRVO's 7.50%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
3.93%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. QRVO's 8.20%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
0.04%
Positive asset growth while QRVO is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.17%
Positive BV/share change while QRVO is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-12.29%
We’re deleveraging while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
5.90%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. QRVO's 0.92%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
2.95%
We expand SG&A while QRVO cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.