PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.04%
Positive revenue growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
0.29%
Gross profit growth under 50% of QRVO's 2.06%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
0.32%
Positive EBIT growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-0.96%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
297.09%
Positive net income growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
294.29%
Positive EPS growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
297.06%
Positive diluted EPS growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.20%
Share reduction while QRVO is at 0.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.20%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.20%
Dividend growth of 0.20% while QRVO is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-42.35%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-45.64%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
56.33%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x QRVO's 20.93%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
47.90%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x QRVO's 20.93%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
27.80%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 136.91%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
134.19%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 691.13%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
247.85%
Below 50% of QRVO's 691.13%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
94.00%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 234.22%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
178.55%
Positive 10Y CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
324.95%
Positive 5Y CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
121.24%
Positive short-term CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
45.75%
Below 50% of QRVO's 318.84%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
9.43%
Below 50% of QRVO's 318.84%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
9.04%
Below 50% of QRVO's 688.14%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
520.16%
Dividend/share CAGR of 520.16% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
196.58%
Dividend/share CAGR of 196.58% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
82.35%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 82.35% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
13.77%
AR growth well above QRVO's 16.07%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
3.83%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. QRVO's 9.39%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-0.77%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
3.16%
Positive BV/share change while QRVO is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
0.02%
Debt growth far above QRVO's 0.03%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-0.26%
Our R&D shrinks while QRVO invests at 0.72%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
5.87%
SG&A growth well above QRVO's 5.04%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.