PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.02%
Revenue growth under 50% of QRVO's 28.21%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
7.03%
Gross profit growth under 50% of QRVO's 35.81%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
10.15%
EBIT growth below 50% of QRVO's 280.13%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
10.59%
Operating income growth under 50% of QRVO's 278.10%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
2.86%
Net income growth under 50% of QRVO's 217.29%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
3.62%
EPS growth under 50% of QRVO's 216.67%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
3.70%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of QRVO's 212.50%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.61%
Share reduction while QRVO is at 0.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.80%
Reduced diluted shares while QRVO is at 2.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.21%
Dividend reduction while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
64.21%
OCF growth at 50-75% of QRVO's 112.14%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
70.86%
FCF growth under 50% of QRVO's 831.37%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
61.96%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of QRVO's 111.33%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
48.84%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 111.33%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
31.55%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 164.55%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
375.35%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 6095.00%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
205.86%
Below 50% of QRVO's 6095.00%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
135.70%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 337.39%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
222.83%
Similar net income/share CAGR to QRVO's 217.72%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
140.33%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of QRVO's 217.72%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
113.67%
Positive short-term CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
43.90%
Below 50% of QRVO's 715.39%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
8.47%
Below 50% of QRVO's 715.39%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
10.29%
Below 50% of QRVO's 614.24%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
520.27%
Dividend/share CAGR of 520.27% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
121.41%
Dividend/share CAGR of 121.41% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
81.19%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 81.19% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
6.67%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. QRVO's 22.81%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
2.85%
We show growth while QRVO is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
5.83%
Asset growth above 1.5x QRVO's 0.55%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
0.54%
Positive BV/share change while QRVO is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
24.23%
Debt growth far above QRVO's 0.03%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-0.26%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
1.85%
We expand SG&A while QRVO cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.