PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.81%
Positive revenue growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
3.64%
Positive gross profit growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
4.17%
EBIT growth below 50% of QRVO's 89.19%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
5.51%
Positive operating income growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
9.20%
Net income growth under 50% of QRVO's 116.67%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
10.14%
EPS growth under 50% of QRVO's 115.38%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
9.56%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of QRVO's 120.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.21%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.31%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.08%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while QRVO cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
10.91%
OCF growth under 50% of QRVO's 55.32%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
21.89%
FCF growth under 50% of QRVO's 80.89%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
75.75%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
22.11%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 244.55%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
9.87%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 47.85%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
220.59%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x QRVO's 123.46%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
63.29%
Below 50% of QRVO's 465.53%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
50.95%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of QRVO's 68.52%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
255.52%
Below 50% of QRVO's 1498.08%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
95.58%
Below 50% of QRVO's 1231.65%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
57.62%
Below 50% of QRVO's 788.80%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
27.78%
Below 50% of QRVO's 105.32%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-2.72%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while QRVO is at 728.25%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-6.47%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
601.27%
Dividend/share CAGR of 601.27% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
156.24%
Dividend/share CAGR of 156.24% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
102.09%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while QRVO cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-5.43%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-1.88%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
3.50%
Positive asset growth while QRVO is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
6.11%
Positive BV/share change while QRVO is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-0.19%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-2.82%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-5.00%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.